Skip to the main content.

3 min read

Allison Rippin Armstrong - The Value of Early Aboriginal Engagement

Allison Rippin Armstrong - The Value of Early Aboriginal Engagement

Allison Rippin ArmstrongAllison Rippin Armstrong, Director of Lands and Environment, Kaminak Gold Corporation, has nearly 20 years of experience working in permitting, regulatory processes and environmental compliance working for resource companies, Aboriginal organizations and NGOs. She is a strong advocate for early engagement and enduring consultation with Aboriginal communities. Allison kindly spent some time with workingeffectivelywithaboriginalpeoples.com to talk about why early engagement is so important.

When is the best time to engage with an Aboriginal community on whose traditional land you are working or plan to work? Before you start your program; before you disturb the ground. It is critical that you understand each community and what their land means to them so that you can be respectful of significant areas and traditional usages. Kaminak engaged with the Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in (TH) First Nation before equipment was on the ground. We believe in early engagement but I know a lot of companies shy away from it because there is a misconception that engagement is onerous and costly.

I understand some companies also shy away from developing comprehensive exploration agreements early on in a project. What are your feelings on this? Exploration agreements are a great way to spell out the various processes thereby providing certainty to both the company and the Aboriginal community. Our Exploration Agreement with TH includes the engagement process and TH’s expectations in terms of engagement and consultation; it includes the process on how traditional knowledge will be gathered, shared and protected; we have a dispute resolution process; and we have employment and business opportunities which includes the hiring process.

Is Aboriginal engagement a one-off process? No, effective engagement is a continuous dialogue.

What is one of the most common oversights you see the exploration sector making when developing their environmental monitoring programs? Our industry often overlooks the fact that Aboriginal people traditionally have a holistic view - they look at the big picture and how everything in it relates, our industry tends look at the individual components in order to build the big picture.

I don’t think the current of way of developing environmental monitoring programs really works. The community needs to be involved in the program design. If you find out from the community members what the land means to them now, historically and in the future that knowledge could change the way that project is designed. Currently, environmental assessment information is gathered, put in a binder and handed to the community for them to review. They should not be reviewers or interveners only - they should be contributors.

What is your preferred approach to the environmental monitoring? I want the community to work with me on the design of the monitoring program, to participate in the monitoring, to review the data they have helped collect so that when we submit our mine proposal they know the project - I don’t want it to be an exercise of consultation after the project is designed. This level of engagement reduces risk to a project.

What are your best pieces of advice for exploration companies that want to do work effectively with an Aboriginal community?

  • Include the community in the design of your program - you will have a better program and you will have community support because they helped design it and they understand it.
  • Conduct stage appropriate environmental monitoring. Carry wildlife sighting sheets with you when you are out on the land working, keep track of species sighted, what they are doing, where they were, how many, etc. If you are disturbing the ground, begin collecting water quality samples. Most of the areas that prospectors and geologists work have not had any monitoring, share any information collected with the community, the local biologists and the regulators. You are providing information that otherwise would not be known or exist. This helps companies be good corporate stewards, address site specific sensitivities if they are identified, inform future baseline program design, inform future development planning, and reduces risks to your project.
  • Provide training to community members so they can participate in the environmental monitoring - for example collecting water samples; ensure the lab results go to the community as well as to the company as this helps to build confidence and trust.
  • Early engagement is important - you only get one chance to make a first impression

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy Aboriginal Engagement - International Association of Public Participation

We also offer courses on consultation and engagement. If you are interested, please contact us.

Sign up for our Working Effectively With Indigenous Peoples Training

Bob Joseph

  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

Aboriginal Engagement - early, often and ongoing

A few years ago I was working for a client on a project when I received a phone call from a local community leader with a request for a corporate...

Read More
Why Aboriginal Stakeholder Engagement Is Bad on Your Business Card

Why Aboriginal Stakeholder Engagement Is Bad on Your Business Card

In this article, we talk about why Aboriginal Stakeholder Engagement is a bad term to have on your business card and what you can do about it. This...

Read More
Indigenous Elder Definition

Indigenous Elder Definition

In this article, we provide the definition of Indigenous Elder and answer some specific questions people ask us in our Working Effectively with...

Read More